DONE
Discussion
-
Linking issue between Rocken.Jobs and the actual Talent Platform – lack of clarity for candidates between the two.
-
Anonymity concerns regarding the jobs advertised on our website versus the jobs displayed in the RT profile. (Do not show company logo and name on RJ)
Landing Page
-
Suggestion: Add a “Already a member?” prompt. (quick apply, ask about account, all places to switch to RT)
-
Vacancy confusion – we tell candidates that jobs in the RT are named as such, but this may be unclear.
-
Categories: What are the main categories based on? Stats or random selection?
-
Functionality briefing: Shouldn’t this be on the homepage?
-
Consultants vs. staff: Clarify the distinction between recruiters and consultants.
-
Filter placement: Why aren’t the filters at the top? Having them in the footer makes them less visible.
Application Page
-
Verified company: How do we determine if a company is verified? Verified = official partner?
-
Applicant regions: Is it possible to restrict applications by region?
-
Adding documents later: No, avoid this option!
Publications
-
Salary expectation: Is it necessary? Not all publications provide this data.
I have the same notes as listed above; however, I would like to add the following points:
-
Blocks about blog articles: These are not necessary as they are used solely for SEO purposes.
-
Clarify the distinction between Rocken Jobs and Rocken Talent in every step: Ensure that the difference between these two services is highlighted in every possible step or context. This should be made clear in case the user overlooks it in earlier steps or considers it only later on.
-
Increase links and CTAs to Rocken.ch: More links and calls to action should be incorporated.
-
Reevaluate the quick apply function: Consider whether it is truly necessary. Assess if the difference between “Apply” and “Quick Apply” is significant enough to warrant both options.
Are the Employment type filters necessary? Because we only offer permanent. I know we have it as a filter in our CRM, but can you make it non-transparent to the outside world? (all filters view)
Is it possible to insert a small button so that the candidate can apply without clicking on the job? (in Similar jobs block on Job page)
more compact? That flashes the eye too much (Benefits block in job description view)
Perhaps the position behind the name? (Rocken Contact on Job view)
I think the blocks are good, but I prefer them to be a little smaller (more compact view of benefits of important information)
Prefer language setting top right (footer)
Job starters "Berufseinsteiger". The target group of young professionals usually has a lot of general questions about the labour market (salary, photo, certificates, career map, etc.). If they click on it, we can redirect them to a ‘career counselling page’. We can provide input. (Quick Filters at the bottom)
from our Rocken Talents or Customers? Or both? (reviews on the main page)
There are too many categories. Can you limit this so that perhaps only 10 are displayed, you click on them and then click on subcategories in a pop-up window? (categories on the main page)
I would say "job categories", because otherwise candidates could think of industry (categories on the main page)
Our professional consultants and recruiter (main page block about RT profile)
Better: Timeline and as Cheryl mentioned like a map. Maybe also a sneakpeek in the background of the Talent platform "Benachrichtigungen" so that it is visualized for the candidate how the platform looks like. (main page how it works)
Black is better than pink. What is the algorithm in the backend for the search line? Is it with boolean rules? For example: Will be there a drop down menu, If i type a letter? Or is it a free text field? (header while scroll)
Just consultant. Not Expert, because not all of them are experts 🙂 Maybe like: Our consultants support the way from your application to your new job offer (hero benefits)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.